Filed: Aug. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1086 BRENDA BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GREEN SPRING VILLAGE INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee, and ERICKSON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY GREEN SPRING VILLAGE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01043-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dism
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1086 BRENDA BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GREEN SPRING VILLAGE INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee, and ERICKSON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY GREEN SPRING VILLAGE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01043-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1086
BRENDA BROWN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GREEN SPRING VILLAGE INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
ERICKSON RETIREMENT COMMUNITY GREEN SPRING VILLAGE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-01043-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Dudley McCluskey,
JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brenda Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to
dismiss her civil complaint. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because one of Brown’s claims
remains pending below, the order Brown seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2