Filed: Nov. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1489 DEBORAH SUE ALDRIDGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COL. STEVEN M. HANSEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00157-REP) Submitted: November 4, 2009 Decided: November 18, 2009 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1489 DEBORAH SUE ALDRIDGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COL. STEVEN M. HANSEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00157-REP) Submitted: November 4, 2009 Decided: November 18, 2009 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion...
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1489 DEBORAH SUE ALDRIDGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COL. STEVEN M. HANSEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00157-REP) Submitted: November 4, 2009 Decided: November 18, 2009 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deborah Sue Aldridge, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Deborah Sue Aldridge appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice her application to proceed in forma pauperis in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Aldridge v. Hansen, No. 3:09-cv-00157-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2009). We deny Aldridge’s motions to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
