Filed: Jun. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1543 In Re: PAUL A. LEE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: June 12, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Lee, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Federal prisoner Paul A. Lee petitions this c
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1543 In Re: PAUL A. LEE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: June 12, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Lee, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Federal prisoner Paul A. Lee petitions this co..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1543 In Re: PAUL A. LEE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: June 12, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Lee, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Federal prisoner Paul A. Lee petitions this court for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to rule on several motions. The district court docket sheet discloses that the court denied the motions on June 9, 2009. As a result, Lee’s request for relief is moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
