Filed: Sep. 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1598 NORMAN ABBOTT; DINAH ABBOTT, Petitioners - Appellants, v. SUN TRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00665-REP) Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009 Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. No
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1598 NORMAN ABBOTT; DINAH ABBOTT, Petitioners - Appellants, v. SUN TRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00665-REP) Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009 Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nor..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1598 NORMAN ABBOTT; DINAH ABBOTT, Petitioners - Appellants, v. SUN TRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00665-REP) Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009 Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Abbott and Dinah Abbott, Appellants Pro Se. Curtis Gilbert Manchester, Travis Aaron Sabalewski, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Norman and Dinah Abbott appeal the district court’s order sanctioning them $1,000 and enjoining them from filing any action involving the subject matter of the instant action, and enjoining them from further unrelated filings without payment of the sanction and leave of court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. Sun Trust Mortgage Inc., No. 3:08-cv-00665-REP (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2