Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dunn v. Meridian Mortgage Investors Fund, 09-1609 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-1609 Visitors: 273
Filed: Oct. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1609 DONNIE R. DUNN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MERIDIAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS FUND VIII, LLC; DOES 1 TO 50, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00018-nkm-bwc) Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Ju
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1609 DONNIE R. DUNN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MERIDIAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS FUND VIII, LLC; DOES 1 TO 50, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00018-nkm-bwc) Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donnie R. Dunn, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Booth Vaden, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donnie R. Dunn appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his action alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, the Homeownership and Equity Protection Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and dismissing without prejudice his state law claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunn v. Meridian Mortgage Investors Fund VIII, LLC, No. 3:09-cv-00018-nkm-bwc (W.D. Va., Moon, J., May 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer