Filed: Nov. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1657 SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; NASSER RASHIDI; LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00628-REP) Submitted: October 28, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HA
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1657 SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; NASSER RASHIDI; LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00628-REP) Submitted: October 28, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAM..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1657
SALAME M. AMR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; NASSER
RASHIDI; LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00628-REP)
Submitted: October 28, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Salame M. Amr seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion to supplement the record for the appeal
to this court of his underlying civil case. Because our
decision in that appeal has issued, Amr v. Virginia State Univ.,
No. 09-1184,
2009 WL 2400275 (4th Cir. Aug. 6, 2009)
(unpublished), this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint,
507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth the principles
of appellate mootness). Therefore, we dismiss Amr’s appeal as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2