Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Davis v. Hampton Public School District, 09-1745 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-1745 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 19, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1745 BRIAN L. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT; SHARON H. WARREN, in her capacity as Director of Special Education for Hampton Public Schools, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00004-RBS-TEM) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 Before WILKI
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1745 BRIAN L. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT; SHARON H. WARREN, in her capacity as Director of Special Education for Hampton Public Schools, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00004-RBS-TEM) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Henry Ballum, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brian L. Davis appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 1400-87 (West 2000 & Supp. 2009); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006); and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 797 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Davis v. Hampton Pub. Sch. Dist., 4:09-cv-00004-RBS- TEM (E.D. Va. filed June 22, 2009; entered June 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer