Filed: Dec. 17, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1875 RENEE R. BERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant – Appellee, and CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ) Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009 Before MICHAEL and D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1875 RENEE R. BERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant – Appellee, and CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ) Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DU..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1875 RENEE R. BERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant – Appellee, and CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ) Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Berry’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v. Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3