Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mayer v. Social Security Administration, 09-1905 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-1905 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1905 JAMES P. MAYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (7:06-cv-00054-FL) Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpubli
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1905 JAMES P. MAYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (7:06-cv-00054-FL) Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James P. Mayer, Appellant Pro Se. Marian Ashley Harder, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James P. Mayer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), seeking reconsideration of the order dismissing his social security and disability benefits action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mayer v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 7:06-cv-00054-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2009). We deny Mayer’s motion to dismantle the Social Security Administration and to pay benefits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer