Filed: Mar. 18, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6031 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRINI MCDANIEL, a/k/a John Paul Morris, a/k/a Brother-in- Law, a/k/a Bro-Law, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-7) Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Ci
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6031 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TRINI MCDANIEL, a/k/a John Paul Morris, a/k/a Brother-in- Law, a/k/a Bro-Law, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-7) Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6031
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRINI MCDANIEL, a/k/a John Paul Morris, a/k/a Brother-in-
Law, a/k/a Bro-Law,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-7)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trini McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Trini McDaniel appeals a district court order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006). The district court found McDaniel was not eligible for
a reduction because he was responsible for more than 4.5
kilograms of crack cocaine. We affirm.
We find the district did not abuse its discretion
denying McDaniel’s motion for a sentence reduction. United
States v. Goines,
357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2