Filed: Jul. 15, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6112 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTTWAINE MANDWELL DUNLAP, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-1) Submitted: July 2, 2009 Decided: July 15, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anttwaine Ma
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6112 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTTWAINE MANDWELL DUNLAP, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-1) Submitted: July 2, 2009 Decided: July 15, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anttwaine Man..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6112 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTTWAINE MANDWELL DUNLAP, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-1) Submitted: July 2, 2009 Decided: July 15, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anttwaine Mandwell Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anttwaine Mandwell Dunlap appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunlap, No. 4:03-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
