Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wilder v. Brooks, 09-6381 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-6381 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6381 SAMUEL ANTHONY WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES T. BROOKS, III; JUDGE MARKLEY R. DENNIS, JR.; DONALD J. ZELENKA; LONETTA B. BRAWLEY, all in their individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03089-MBS) Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 Before WILKINSON
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6381 SAMUEL ANTHONY WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES T. BROOKS, III; JUDGE MARKLEY R. DENNIS, JR.; DONALD J. ZELENKA; LONETTA B. BRAWLEY, all in their individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03089-MBS) Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Anthony Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samuel Anthony Wilder appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying his motion for a preliminary injunction, and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Brooks, No. 3:08-cv-03089-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer