Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gould v. Newport News, 09-6497 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-6497 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 25, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6497 KELVIN GOULD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NEWPORT NEWS; VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S, City of Newport News, VA; ALEXANDER C. LEVY; BRIAN P. KEELEY; OLDRIC J. LABELL, JR.; ROBERT N. PRITCHARD; ALEXANDRIA CHUN; AARON M. THOMPSON, Detective; JEFFREY C. ROUNTREE, Attorney at Law, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6497 KELVIN GOULD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NEWPORT NEWS; VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S, City of Newport News, VA; ALEXANDER C. LEVY; BRIAN P. KEELEY; OLDRIC J. LABELL, JR.; ROBERT N. PRITCHARD; ALEXANDRIA CHUN; AARON M. THOMPSON, Detective; JEFFREY C. ROUNTREE, Attorney at Law, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00092-JBF-FBS) Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gould v. Newport News, No. 2:09-cv- 00092-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2009). We deny Gould’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer