Filed: Jul. 07, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6569 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDRE KEBE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:97-cr-00357-DKC-1) Submitted: June 12, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Kebe, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berma
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6569 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDRE KEBE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:97-cr-00357-DKC-1) Submitted: June 12, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Kebe, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6569 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDRE KEBE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:97-cr-00357-DKC-1) Submitted: June 12, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Kebe, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andre Kebe appeals the district court’s orders denying Kebe’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kebe, No. 8:97-cr- 00357-DKC-1 (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2009). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
