Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carter v. Anderson, 09-7378 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7378 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 27, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7378 RAYMOND W. CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN ANDERSON, Wateree Correctional Institution; WARDEN WHITE, Wateree Correctional Institution; PRINCIPAL DIVINE, Ridgeland Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-00497-GRA) Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: O
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7378 RAYMOND W. CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN ANDERSON, Wateree Correctional Institution; WARDEN WHITE, Wateree Correctional Institution; PRINCIPAL DIVINE, Ridgeland Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-00497-GRA) Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond W. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., Samuel C. Weldon, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Raymond W. Carter appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Anderson, Case No. 6:08-cv-00497-GRA (D.S.C. July 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer