Filed: Oct. 22, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7628 JEFFREY T. LAWSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EMPLOYEES OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V. S. GRAY; O. CHAMBERS; GAIL JONES; MS. MATTHEWS; MRS. FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00258-jct-mfu) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7628 JEFFREY T. LAWSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EMPLOYEES OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V. S. GRAY; O. CHAMBERS; GAIL JONES; MS. MATTHEWS; MRS. FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00258-jct-mfu) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7628 JEFFREY T. LAWSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EMPLOYEES OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V. S. GRAY; O. CHAMBERS; GAIL JONES; MS. MATTHEWS; MRS. FOSTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00258-jct-mfu) Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey T. Lawson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeffrey T. Lawson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lawson v. Employees of Virginia Dep’t of Corr., No. 7:09-cv-00258-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
