Filed: Dec. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7631 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:98-cr-00013-H-1) Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrance La
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7631 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:98-cr-00013-H-1) Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrance Lam..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7631
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:98-cr-00013-H-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrance Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terrance Lamont Moore appeals from the district
court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram
nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. A writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651
(2000) can be used to vacate a conviction when there is a
fundamental error resulting in conviction and no other means of
relief is available. United States v. Morgan,
346 U.S. 502,
509-11 (1954); United States v. Mandel,
862 F.2d 1067, 1074-75
(4th Cir. 1988). Moore fails to establish the grounds needed to
obtain relief under the writ. Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2