Filed: Jun. 05, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1230 GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; RICHARD B. CHENEY; NANCY PELOSI; JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.; US PERSONS, thereof, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-04137-GRA) Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009 Before WILKINSON, KIN
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1230 GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; RICHARD B. CHENEY; NANCY PELOSI; JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.; US PERSONS, thereof, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-04137-GRA) Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009 Before WILKINSON, KING..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1230
GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; RICHARD B.
CHENEY; NANCY PELOSI; JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.; US PERSONS,
thereof,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:08-cv-04137-GRA)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George C. McCullough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George C. McCullough appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. McCullough v. United States, No. 8:08-cv-04137-
GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2