Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hendricks, 18-4121 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-4121 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 22, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7915 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHALMERS LAVETTE HENDRICKS, a/k/a Champ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00030-MR-GCM-4) Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirme
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7915 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHALMERS LAVETTE HENDRICKS, a/k/a Champ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00030-MR-GCM-4) Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chalmers Lavette Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chalmers Lavette Hendricks appeals a district court order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Hendricks was not entitled to a reduction because even with the benefit of Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his Guidelines range of imprisonment remained the same. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer