Filed: Apr. 08, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6246 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYREES COLOZA WHITEHEAD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00112-JRS-1) Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 8, 2009 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert James Wagner, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6246 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYREES COLOZA WHITEHEAD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00112-JRS-1) Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 8, 2009 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert James Wagner, As..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6246 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYREES COLOZA WHITEHEAD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00112-JRS-1) Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 8, 2009 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tyrees Coloza Whitehead appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Whitehead, No. 3:90-cr-00112-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
