Filed: Apr. 21, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6701 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL D. STEPHENSON, a/k/a Little Mikey, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00038-JBF-JEB-1) Submitted: April 8, 2010 Decided: April 21, 2010 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6701 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL D. STEPHENSON, a/k/a Little Mikey, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00038-JBF-JEB-1) Submitted: April 8, 2010 Decided: April 21, 2010 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpub..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6701
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL D. STEPHENSON, a/k/a Little Mikey, a/k/a Mikey,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:05-cr-00038-JBF-JEB-1)
Submitted: April 8, 2010 Decided: April 21, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Stephenson, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Stephenson appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), and motions for clarification and
reconsideration. In light of our recent decision in United
States v. Stewart,
595 F.3d 197 (4th Cir. 2010), we vacate the
district court’s orders and remand for further proceedings
consistent with Stewart. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2