Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hinton v. Trans Union LLC, 09-1926 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-1926
Filed: Jun. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1926 KENNETH HINTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TRANS UNION LLC; EQUIFAX, INC., d/b/a Equifax Information Services LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00170-TSE-IDD) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1926 KENNETH HINTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TRANS UNION LLC; EQUIFAX, INC., d/b/a Equifax Information Services LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00170-TSE-IDD) Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Erik J. Grohmann, Paul L. Myers, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Keasha Ann Broussard, Barry Goheen, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth Hinton appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss his second amended complaint alleging claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hinton v. Trans Union LLC, No. 1:09-cv-00170-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer