Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dutton v. Montgomery County Maryland, 09-2016 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-2016 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2016 EDWARD L. DUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; SAM HSU, Captain; MARCUS WESTOVER; D. SUGURE, Officer; JENNIFER POWELL, Officer; MARCUS JONES, Lieutenant; JOY TURNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-03504-DKC) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010 Bef
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2016 EDWARD L. DUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; SAM HSU, Captain; MARCUS WESTOVER; D. SUGURE, Officer; JENNIFER POWELL, Officer; MARCUS JONES, Lieutenant; JOY TURNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-03504-DKC) Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010 Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward L. Dutton, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, Chief, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Danielle E. Marone, Jo Anna Schmidt, SCHMIDT, DAILEY & O’NEILL, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; James F. Shalleck, Montgomery, Maryland; Lindsay Nichole Warnes, Rockville, Maryland; Jessica Lynn Ellsworth, Steven Paul Hollman, HOGAN & HARSON, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward L. Dutton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dutton v. Montgomery County Maryland, No. 8:08-cv-03504-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer