Filed: May 17, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2042 JEFFREY ALLEN LARSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ED ADAMS, Department of Labor and Industry for Vocational Rehabilitation; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; DAVID SHARP, Counselor, Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services; PAM PUDELKA, Counselor, Del Mar College; WALTER THEME, III, Counselor, Del Mar College; VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM; OFFICER DOMINIGUEZ, Badge 1198; CORPUS
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2042 JEFFREY ALLEN LARSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ED ADAMS, Department of Labor and Industry for Vocational Rehabilitation; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; DAVID SHARP, Counselor, Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services; PAM PUDELKA, Counselor, Del Mar College; WALTER THEME, III, Counselor, Del Mar College; VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM; OFFICER DOMINIGUEZ, Badge 1198; CORPUS C..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2042
JEFFREY ALLEN LARSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ED ADAMS, Department of Labor and Industry for Vocational
Rehabilitation; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN
DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; DAVID SHARP, Counselor, Texas
Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services; PAM
PUDELKA, Counselor, Del Mar College; WALTER THEME, III,
Counselor, Del Mar College; VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM;
OFFICER DOMINIGUEZ, Badge 1198; CORPUS CHRISTI POLICE;
TERRY BAILY, TDCJ Headquarters; YUONNE MARLINEZ DENKO,
Corrections Training Division for the State of New Mexico;
RAFA SMITH, DOC Headquarters,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-cv-00437-FL)
Submitted: April 21, 2010 Decided: May 17, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Allen Larson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Allen Larson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Larson v. Adams, No. 5:08-cv-00437-FL (E.D.N.C.
Dec. 19, 2008). We deny Larson’s motion for appointment of
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3