Filed: Jun. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2140 W. WALKER WARE, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA; E. JAMES, Officer; MILLER, Officer; STEN, Senior Officer; MCMICHAEL, Sergeant, Defendants – Appellees, R. MICHAEL AMYX, Movant – Appellee, v. P. STEVEN CRAIG; VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, Movants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:08-cv-
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2140 W. WALKER WARE, IV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA; E. JAMES, Officer; MILLER, Officer; STEN, Senior Officer; MCMICHAEL, Sergeant, Defendants – Appellees, R. MICHAEL AMYX, Movant – Appellee, v. P. STEVEN CRAIG; VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, Movants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:08-cv-0..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2140
W. WALKER WARE, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA; E. JAMES, Officer; MILLER,
Officer; STEN, Senior Officer; MCMICHAEL, Sergeant,
Defendants – Appellees,
R. MICHAEL AMYX,
Movant – Appellee,
v.
P. STEVEN CRAIG; VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE,
Movants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:08-cv-00008-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: June 2, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, SHEDD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Higginbottom, KEVIN P. SHEA & ASSOCIATES, Hampton,
Virginia, for Appellant. Jeremy D. Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR,
CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
W. Walker Ware, IV, appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Ware’s action
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and Virginia common law. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ware v.
James City County, Va., No. 4:08-cv-00008-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va.
Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3