Filed: Jun. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2186 BILLY GENE COGDILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03466-CMC) Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 2, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John K. Koon, KOON
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2186 BILLY GENE COGDILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03466-CMC) Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 2, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John K. Koon, KOON ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2186 BILLY GENE COGDILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN GENERAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03466-CMC) Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 2, 2010 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John K. Koon, KOON AND COOK, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William C. Wood, Jr., NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Billy Cogdill appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Cogdill’s claim for recovery under an accidental death insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cogdill v. American Gen. Assurance Co., No. 3:08-cv- 03466-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
