Filed: May 10, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2219 PYI SONE AYE, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: May 10, 2010 Before KING, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carmen DiAmore-Siah, LAW OFFICE OF CARMEN DIAMORE-SIAH, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney Gener
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2219 PYI SONE AYE, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: May 10, 2010 Before KING, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carmen DiAmore-Siah, LAW OFFICE OF CARMEN DIAMORE-SIAH, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney Genera..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2219
PYI SONE AYE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: May 10, 2010
Before KING, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carmen DiAmore-Siah, LAW OFFICE OF CARMEN DIAMORE-SIAH,
Honolulu, Hawaii, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney
General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant Director, Anthony P.
Nicastro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pyi Sone Aye, a native and citizen of Burma, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) summarily dismissing his appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A), (E) (2009). We have reviewed the record
and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. See In re: Aye (B.I.A. July 27, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2