Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 09-2358 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-2358 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2358 DEQUILLA WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK) Submitted: February 10, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010 Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublish
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2358 DEQUILLA WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK) Submitted: February 10, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010 Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dequilla Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Crosby, Keith Michael Weddington, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dequilla Walker appeals a district court order and judgment dismissing her complaint against the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Schools. We have reviewed the record and the opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:09-cv-00035- RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2009). We also find the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Walker’s motion to amend the complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer