Filed: Apr. 26, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2395 WALTER D. HAYES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law; PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR.; GLADYS HAYES-OWENS; CHARLES EVERETT MALONE, Attorney at Law, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS) Submitted: April 22, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2395 WALTER D. HAYES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law; PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR.; GLADYS HAYES-OWENS; CHARLES EVERETT MALONE, Attorney at Law, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS) Submitted: April 22, 201..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2395 WALTER D. HAYES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law; PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR.; GLADYS HAYES-OWENS; CHARLES EVERETT MALONE, Attorney at Law, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS) Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter D. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Walter D. Hayes appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of Hayes’ civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion to overturn the district court’s decision and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Morrison, No. 2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2