Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Williams, 09-6227 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-6227 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 03, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6227 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IKE RAYEFORD WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 1:02-cv-00359) Submitted: January 25, 2010 Decided: February 3, 2010 Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed b
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6227 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IKE RAYEFORD WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 1:02-cv-00359) Submitted: January 25, 2010 Decided: February 3, 2010 Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George B. Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina; M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., RUDOLF, WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ike Rayeford Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his “Motion to Re-enter Previous Order of 24 June 2005.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. 1:98-cr-00101-NCT-3; 1:02-cv-00359 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer