Filed: Apr. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BALTASARAS ROMILUS, a/k/a Haitian Bill, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-F-15) Submitted: April 13, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010 Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BALTASARAS ROMILUS, a/k/a Haitian Bill, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-F-15) Submitted: April 13, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010 Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7324
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BALTASARAS ROMILUS, a/k/a Haitian Bill,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:94-cr-00097-F-15)
Submitted: April 13, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010
Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Baltasaras Romilus, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Baltasaras Romilus appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and agree with
the district court’s conclusion that Romilus was not eligible
for a sentence reduction because he was found responsible for
more than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Romilus,
No. 5:94-cr-00097-F-15 (E.D.N.C. July 13, 2009). We deny
Romilus’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2