Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miller v. SC Department of Corrections, 09-7751 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7751 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 27, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7751 JOHN ALAN MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; PATRICIA COOK; DARREN SEWARD, co- conspirators, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-02009-JFA) Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, KI
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7751 JOHN ALAN MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; PATRICIA COOK; DARREN SEWARD, co- conspirators, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-02009-JFA) Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Alan Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Alan Miller appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action and denying reconsideration of that order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Miller’s brief alleges no error committed by the district court. We therefore find Miller has forfeited appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Further, we deny Miller’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer