Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cosby, 09-7814A (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-7814A Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7814 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JEANNIE LARGENT COSBY, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00033-MR-3) Submitted: May 3, 2010 Decided: June 2, 2010 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                            No. 09-7814


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

JEANNIE LARGENT COSBY,

                Defendant – Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville.  Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00033-MR-3)


Submitted:   May 3, 2010                      Decided:   June 2, 2010


Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Jeannie Largent Cosby, Appellant Pro Se.     Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Jeannie    Largent      Cosby     appeals    the   district   court’s

order denying her motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).      We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.           United States v. Cosby, No. 1:07-cr-

00033-MR-3    (W.D.N.C.   July    31,     2009).      We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                        AFFIRMED




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer