Filed: Mar. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1662 BERNARD AKWASI ACHEAMPONG, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 11, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kofi Asamoah, ASAMOAH & ASSOCIATES, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney G
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1662 BERNARD AKWASI ACHEAMPONG, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 11, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kofi Asamoah, ASAMOAH & ASSOCIATES, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney Ge..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1662
BERNARD AKWASI ACHEAMPONG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: March 11, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kofi Asamoah, ASAMOAH & ASSOCIATES, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for
Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, William C.
Peachey, Assistant Director, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Akwasi Acheampong, a native and citizen of
Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) denying relief from removal. We
have reviewed the administrative record and Acheampong’s claims
and agree with the agency decision that he is removable for
having been convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) (2006). We accordingly deny the petition
for review. See In re: Acheampong (B.I.A. May 14, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2