Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Dial, 096328 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 096328 Visitors: 35
Filed: Mar. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6328 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLYDE DIAL, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00090-F-1) Submitted: November 16, 2009 Decided: March 25, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                            No. 09-6328


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          v.

CLYDE DIAL, JR.,

                Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00090-F-1)


Submitted:   November 16, 2009            Decided:   March 25, 2010


Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Clyde Dial, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf
A. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Clyde   Dial,   Jr.    appeals    the   district    court’s   order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction

in sentence.    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.      Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.       United States v. Dial, No. 7:02-cr-00090-F-1

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2009).          We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials    before   the   court     and    argument   would   not   aid   the

decisional process.

                                                                      AFFIRMED




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer