Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yecheskel v. Bank of America Corporation, 10-1111 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-1111 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1111 ELI YECHESKEL; KAREN YECHESKEL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, f/k/a Countrywide Financial Corporation; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02335-RWT) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1111 ELI YECHESKEL; KAREN YECHESKEL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, f/k/a Countrywide Financial Corporation; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02335-RWT) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eli Yecheskel, Karen Yecheskel, Appellants Pro Se. Glenn Cline, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Sandy David Baron, Alan Barry Sternstein, SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, PA, Potomac, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eli and Karen Yecheskel appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yecheskel v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 8:09-cv-02335-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer