Filed: Sep. 21, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1217 ANGELA AYRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. WARD; JACOB GEESING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02077-RWT) Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1217 ANGELA AYRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. WARD; JACOB GEESING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02077-RWT) Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1217 ANGELA AYRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; HOWARD BIERMAN; CARRIE M. WARD; JACOB GEESING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09- cv-02077-RWT) Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 21, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela Ayres, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Newman Strandberg, REBECCA STRANDBERG & ASSOCIATES, PA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angela Ayres appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ayres v. Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, No. 8:09-cv- 02077-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
