In Re: Fleming, 10-1424 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 10-1424
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 14, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1424 In Re: DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:91-cr-00179-NCT) Submitted: June 3, 2010 Decided: June 14, 2010 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Marquis Fleming, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derek Marquis Fleming petit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1424 In Re: DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:91-cr-00179-NCT) Submitted: June 3, 2010 Decided: June 14, 2010 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Marquis Fleming, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derek Marquis Fleming petiti..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1424 In Re: DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:91-cr-00179-NCT) Submitted: June 3, 2010 Decided: June 14, 2010 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Marquis Fleming, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derek Marquis Fleming petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying his motion to correct judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Fleming’s motion to expedite as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source: CourtListener
