Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stuart v. LaSalle Bank National Association, 10-1446 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-1446 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 21, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1446 DONALD E. STUART, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee Under the Pooling and Serving Agreement Dated as of December 1, 2006, GSAMP Trust 2006-HE8; BAC NORTH AMERICA HOLDING COMPANY; BANK OF AMERICA; ANY UNKNOWN HOLDER OF NOTE, As to Loan Transaction Dated July 25, 2006 Between Plaintiff and Aegis Lending Corporation Secured by Deed of Trust that was a Lien on his Home at 2323 Buckner
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1446 DONALD E. STUART, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee Under the Pooling and Serving Agreement Dated as of December 1, 2006, GSAMP Trust 2006-HE8; BAC NORTH AMERICA HOLDING COMPANY; BANK OF AMERICA; ANY UNKNOWN HOLDER OF NOTE, As to Loan Transaction Dated July 25, 2006 Between Plaintiff and Aegis Lending Corporation Secured by Deed of Trust that was a Lien on his Home at 2323 Buckner Street, Petersburg, VA 23805, Defendants – Appellees, and AEGIS LENDING CORPORATION, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00459-JRS) Submitted: December 7, 2010 Decided: December 21, 2010 Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry W. McLaughlin, III, LAW OFFICE OF HENRY MCLAUGHLIN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. John C. Lynch, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Donald E. Stuart appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stuart v. LaSalle Bank Lending Ass’n, No. 3:09-cv-00459-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb 11 & Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer