Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jordan v. Gobo, Inc., 10-1589 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-1589 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 31, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1589 DANNY ANTONIO JORDAN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOBO, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dan
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1589 DANNY ANTONIO JORDAN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOBO, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Ernest Falcone, PETTY, LIVINGSTON, DAWSON & RICHARDS, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant on his action brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jordan v. Gobo, Inc., No. 6:09-cv-00059- nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2010). In light of this disposition, we deny the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer