Filed: Jun. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6222 JOVAN WATKINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; KATHLEEN GREEN, (Warden of ECI); CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE; DR. ASTER BERHANE, (CMS Doctor), Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-00294-DKC) Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010 Before MOTZ and KING, Circu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6222 JOVAN WATKINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; KATHLEEN GREEN, (Warden of ECI); CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE; DR. ASTER BERHANE, (CMS Doctor), Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-00294-DKC) Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010 Before MOTZ and KING, Circui..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6222
JOVAN WATKINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS; KATHLEEN GREEN, (Warden of
ECI); CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE; DR. ASTER BERHANE, (CMS
Doctor),
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-00294-DKC)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jovan Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, Philip
Melton Andrews, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jovan Watkins appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in Watkins’ 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Watkins v. Md. Div. of
Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00294-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2010). We deny
Watkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2