Filed: Aug. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6251 CHARLES E. LAWSON, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. B. G. WILSON, Officer Sumter County, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:08-cv-03917-GRA) Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charle
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6251 CHARLES E. LAWSON, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. B. G. WILSON, Officer Sumter County, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:08-cv-03917-GRA) Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6251
CHARLES E. LAWSON, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
B. G. WILSON, Officer Sumter County,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (0:08-cv-03917-GRA)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 2, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles E. Lawson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alfred Johnston Cox,
ELLIS, LAWHORNE & SIMS, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Lawson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Lawson’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lawson v. Wilson, No. 0:08-cv-03917-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2