Filed: Oct. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6349 SAMSON M. PARKER, Petitioner – Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00780-LO-TCB) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samson M. Par
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6349 SAMSON M. PARKER, Petitioner – Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00780-LO-TCB) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samson M. Park..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6349 SAMSON M. PARKER, Petitioner – Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00780-LO-TCB) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samson M. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Samson M. Parker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for copies at the government’s expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Dir. of Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:08-cv-00780-LO- TCB (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 16, 2010 & entered Feb. 18, 2010). We deny Parker’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
