Filed: Aug. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6469 KENNETH J. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; MITCH P. LUCAS, Detention Center Administrator; A. HANSON, Major at Detention Center; CAPTAIN GATHERS, at Detention Center; CAPTAIN BEATTY, at Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cv-00776-PMD
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6469 KENNETH J. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; MITCH P. LUCAS, Detention Center Administrator; A. HANSON, Major at Detention Center; CAPTAIN GATHERS, at Detention Center; CAPTAIN BEATTY, at Detention Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cv-00776-PMD)..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6469
KENNETH J. JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; MITCH P. LUCAS, Detention Center
Administrator; A. HANSON, Major at Detention Center; CAPTAIN
GATHERS, at Detention Center; CAPTAIN BEATTY, at Detention
Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (4:08-cv-00776-PMD)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth J. Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan,
III, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina; Harry V.
Ragsdale, CORRIGAN & CHANDLER, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth J. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Cannon, No. 4:08-cv-00776-PMD (D.S.C. Mar.
15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2