Filed: Oct. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6510 MARCUS ALLS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00506-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Alls, Appell
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6510 MARCUS ALLS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00506-LMB-TRJ) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Alls, Appella..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6510
MARCUS ALLS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00506-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Alls, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Alls, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Alls v. Stansberry, No.
1:09-cv-00506-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2