Filed: Aug. 30, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6556 HECTOR MOREL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN O’BRIEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hector Morel, Appellant Pro Se. Sara B
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6556 HECTOR MOREL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN O’BRIEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hector Morel, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6556
HECTOR MOREL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN O’BRIEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hector Morel, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hector Morel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Morel v. O’Brien, No.
7:09-cv-00346-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va., Mar. 25, 2010). We deny
Morel’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2