Filed: Oct. 05, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6633 STEPHEN YAGMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TRACY JOHNS; ARTHUR BEELER; HARLEY LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; KERRY MOTTERN; MITCHELL SPRINKLE; DERICK PHILLIPS, Defendants – Appellees, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03089-FL) Subm
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6633 STEPHEN YAGMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TRACY JOHNS; ARTHUR BEELER; HARLEY LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; KERRY MOTTERN; MITCHELL SPRINKLE; DERICK PHILLIPS, Defendants – Appellees, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03089-FL) Submi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6633
STEPHEN YAGMAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TRACY JOHNS; ARTHUR BEELER; HARLEY LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; KERRY
MOTTERN; MITCHELL SPRINKLE; DERICK PHILLIPS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
TEN UNKNOWN NAMED FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON OFFICERS AND/OR
EMPLOYEES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03089-FL)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Yagman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Yagman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Yagman v. Johns, No. 5:08-ct-03089-FL (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3