Filed: Oct. 12, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7098 LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01483-BEL) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7098 LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01483-BEL) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7098
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01483-BEL)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal
Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (2006), and Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Maxwell v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-01483-BEL
(D. Md. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2