Filed: Dec. 27, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7140 THOMAS W. CODER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent – Appellee, and SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00352-gec-mfu) Submitted: December 10, 2010 Decided: December 27, 2010 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed b
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7140 THOMAS W. CODER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent – Appellee, and SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00352-gec-mfu) Submitted: December 10, 2010 Decided: December 27, 2010 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7140
THOMAS W. CODER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (7:09-cv-00352-gec-mfu)
Submitted: December 10, 2010 Decided: December 27, 2010
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas W. Coder, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Coder appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.
2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Coder v. O’Brien,
719 F. Supp. 2d
655 (W.D. Va. 2010). We deny Coder’s motion for oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2