Filed: Dec. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7150 KEITH V. HARNED, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SARA REVELL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02129-FL) Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010 Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7150 KEITH V. HARNED, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SARA REVELL, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02129-FL) Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010 Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith V..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7150
KEITH V. HARNED,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
SARA REVELL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02129-FL)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith V. Harned, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith V. Harned, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Harned v. Revell, No. 5:09-hc-02129-FL (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2